The Untold Childhood Stories & Biographies of Football Stars
Lifebogger Editorial Standards
Editorial Guidelines
These guidelines set out the standards Lifebogger applies to every biography, profile and news story we publish. They apply to all our content, all our writers, and all our contributors — without exception.
Lifebogger publishes biographies of living people — footballers, athletes, and the families around them. That places a duty on us that ordinary entertainment publishing does not carry. A wrong date is an error. A wrong claim about someone’s family, health, relationship or finances can cause real harm to a real person.
These guidelines exist so that duty is written down rather than assumed. They tell our writers what we require before a claim reaches the page, what must be escalated to an editor, and what we do when we get something wrong. We publish them openly so our readers can hold us to them.
Our four editorial values
- Accuracy. We verify before we publish, and we name our sources.
- Privacy. Family members are not public figures by association.
- Fairness. We give people a right of reply before we publish about them.
- Accountability. We correct openly and we say what changed.
The Guidelines
Each section sets out our principles, the specific rules our writers follow, and the situations that must be referred to an editor before publication.
Accuracy & Sourcing
What we require before stating something as fact — sourcing standards, handling rumour and transfer speculation, net worth and salary claims, and the use of AI tools.
Privacy & Family Members
How we treat partners, parents, siblings and children of public figures — including the absolute rules on minors, private addresses, health and images.
Fairness & Right of Reply
Our obligations to the people we write about: putting allegations to them, representing their words accurately, and dealing fairly with contributors.
Corrections & Complaints
How to tell us we got it wrong, what we do about it, how quickly we act, and how we log every change we make to a published article.
Think we got something wrong?
We would rather hear it from you than leave it on the page. Every correction request is read by an editor, and we aim to respond within five working days.
